Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 300 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $77.85 vs $270.54
- Up to 68% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.52 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2500X - 182 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
167
91.75824175824175%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32597 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
31.51515151515152%
Price, €
€300.3
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €300.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
65.15062020082694%
Multi-Core
3801
38.24713221976253%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |