Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 144 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $77.85 vs $136.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.27 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 342 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
323
94.44444444444444%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31699 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
342
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
61.36363636363637%
Price, €
€150.96
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €150.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
88.59437751004016%
Multi-Core
3801
62.17896286602323%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |