Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 144 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $77.85 vs $102.37
- Up to 23% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.41 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 2500X - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 12 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
212
99.53051643192488%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49992 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
77.35849056603773%
Price, €
€113.63
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
95.74652777777779%
Multi-Core
3801
78.5168353645941%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |