Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1469 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8370 - 169 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-8370 - $77.85 vs $181.35
- Up to 60% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-8370 - $0.51 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32802 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
158
93.49112426035504%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
40.15748031496063%
Price, €
€201.3
42%
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32799 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |