Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1896 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Ryzen 5 2500U - 189 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Single-Core
814
29.816849816849818%
Multi-Core
2330
13.531563970033103%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |