Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500U is 2206 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Performs up to 7% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 640 vs 596 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |