Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1938 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8300 - 101 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $81.91 vs $98.71
- Up to 6% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2400G - $1.01 vs $1.08 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
93%
Price, €
€109.57
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |