Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1808 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3770 - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3770 - $0.65 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $89.23 vs $91.4
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.45
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13933 minutes ago
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |