Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 958 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 1600X - 133 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 64 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1262.07
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,262.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
68.64303178484109%
Multi-Core
4766
34.023415191319245%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |