Buy on Amazon
€101.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than FX-8300 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $81.91 vs $91.4
- Up to 5% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1600X - $0.82 vs $0.86 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
95%
Price, €
€101.45
89%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18300 minutes ago
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.