Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1870 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 270 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $31.32 vs $91.4
- Up to 63% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600X - $0.14 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
36%
Price, €
€101.45
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |