Buy on Amazon
€158.27
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $189
Availability
MSRP in USD: $189
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1500X is 98 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Saints Row than Celeron G3930 - 156 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1500X - $14.37 vs $142.59
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD YD150XBBAEBOX Ryzen 5 1500X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €15.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1500X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.072463768115945%
Multi-Core
1043
28.62239297475302%
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.