Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 121 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $142.59 vs $456.96
- Up to 68% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.57 vs $4.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 1500X - 103 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 32 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
101
98.05825242718447%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17238 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
31.91056910569106%
Price, €
€507.23
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1104
94.27839453458581%
Multi-Core
3644
48.33532298713357%
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |