Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $80.43 vs $163.78
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - $0.34 vs $0.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 279 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
265
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10261 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
52%
Price, €
€181.8
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €181.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |