Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 98 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $80.43 vs $94.32
- Up to 4% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-7300 - $0.48 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 209 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
186
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Core i3-7300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |