Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 588 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $29.18 vs $80.43
- Up to 62% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1400 - $0.21 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |