Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1870 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 169 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $31.32 vs $31.35
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.8
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €34.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16077 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |