Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $110.41 vs $128.55
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-14400F - $0.82 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
149
93.125%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38394 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
92.13483146067415%
Price, €
€142.69
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €142.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
46.8936170212766%
Multi-Core
3078
27.09745576195088%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |