Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 1490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3900 - 156 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $29.18 vs $110.41
- Up to 72% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $0.22 vs $0.79 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
27.848101265822784%
Price, €
€122.55
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41070 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
93.58974358974359%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.722323049001815%
Multi-Core
992
32.228719948018195%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |