Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 1917 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $48.81 vs $54.84
- Up to 10% better value when playing Control than Core i5-7600K - $0.27 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
90.00000000000001%
Price, €
€60.87
89%
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |