Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in War Thunder than Core i5-6600 - 196 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $53.85 vs $109.68
- Up to 44% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.35 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
56%
Price, €
€121.75
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
173
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |