Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 967 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.94011976047905%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |