Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 115 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3250U - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
47.31182795698925%
Multi-Core
1447
20.64194008559201%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
