Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 480 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 3 3200U - 710 vs 636 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 12 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
710
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |