Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $57.08 vs $291.75
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900K - $0.63 vs $2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 112 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.89/FPS
21%
Price, €
€323.84
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |