Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $59.5 vs $193.77
- Up to 63% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900K - $0.29 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3200G - 271 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15308 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
36%
Price, €
€215.08
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |