Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $59.5 vs $165.23
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-10700F - $0.55 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 3 3200G - 132 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
120
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13696 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
39%
Price, €
€183.41
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |