Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $54.84 vs $57.08
- Up to 3% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.31 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €63.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |