Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $59.5 vs $153.54
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - $0.56 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3200G - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
117
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17419 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
43%
Price, €
€170.43
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |