Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $59.5 vs $196.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13600K - $0.28 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 259 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
237
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13420 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
33%
Price, €
€218.32
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |