Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $57.81 vs $71.3
- Up to 18% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-10400F - $0.28 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 234 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
230
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
82%
Price, €
€79.14
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |