Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 915 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3200G - 246 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $35.17 vs $56.58
- Up to 38% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.16 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €62.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |