Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1405 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $59.5 vs $73.12
- Up to 18% better value when playing Control than Core i3-6100 - $0.33 vs $0.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12345 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |