Buy on Amazon
€66.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $59.5 vs $87.75
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - $0.37 vs $0.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 190 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8003 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.