Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1400% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $46.74 vs $51.05
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €56.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77548 minutes ago
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
57.79467680608364%
Multi-Core
1043
34.616661135081316%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |