Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 78% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - 119 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $29.18 vs $59.33
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €65.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
55.22813688212928%
Multi-Core
992
32.923996017258546%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |