Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 502 days newer than Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 207 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
188
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 722 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E |
Matisse | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |