Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $72.46 vs $358.28
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900K - $0.43 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 198 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
185
93.43434343434343%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6475 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
21.39303482587065%
Price, €
€397.69
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €397.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Single-Core
1479
84.56260720411663%
Multi-Core
5081
55.45127141765798%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |