Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3100 - 58 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $29.24 vs $54.28
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74504 minutes ago
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |