Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than FX-8300 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-8300 - $54.18 vs $77.55
- Up to 37% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8300 - $0.49 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12709 minutes ago
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |