Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1795 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $80.43 vs $427.75
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KS - $0.45 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 2200G - 234 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
198
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10084 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
22%
Price, €
€474.8
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €474.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |