Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 622 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 198 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $87.75 vs $95.05
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.49 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12772 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12771 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |