Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 508 vs 459 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $29.18 vs $80.43
- Up to 61% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.07 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
508
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
38.88888888888889%
Price, €
€89.28
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61014 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
90.35433070866141%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
58.27482447342026%
Multi-Core
992
34.70958712386284%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |