Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1938 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than FX-8320 - 253 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-8320 - $95.05 vs $127.96
- Up to 31% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8320 - $0.42 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9058 minutes ago
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |