Buy on Amazon
€52.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $47.7 vs $165.23
- Up to 70% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700F - $0.31 vs $1.02 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 1300X - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
169
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.95
100%
Value Winner
Large Scale Integration Ryzen 3 1300X R3 1300X 3.5 GHz Gaming Zen 0.014 Quad- Quad-Thread CPU Processor YD130XBBM4KAE Socket AM4 Implementing Multi-Threaded Operations
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19153 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
30%
Price, €
€183.41
28%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.