Buy on Amazon
€52.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 635 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $47.7 vs $58.5
- Up to 17% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-9100F - $0.24 vs $0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Ryzen 3 1300X - 226 vs 222 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
222
98.23008849557522%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.95
100%
Value Winner
Large Scale Integration Ryzen 3 1300X R3 1300X 3.5 GHz Gaming Zen 0.014 Quad- Quad-Thread CPU Processor YD130XBBM4KAE Socket AM4 Implementing Multi-Threaded Operations
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
82.75862068965517%
Price, €
€64.93
81%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
79.83988355167394%
Multi-Core
3157
86.04524393567729%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.