Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 338 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $14.37 vs $47.7
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Buy for €15.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.42388331814039%
Multi-Core
1043
33.03769401330377%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |