Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8300 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-8300 - $47.7 vs $81.91
- Up to 46% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8300 - $0.42 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14320 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |