Buy on Amazon
€52.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 238 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-6300 - $47.7 vs $71.68
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Large Scale Integration Ryzen 3 1300X R3 1300X 3.5 GHz Gaming Zen 0.014 Quad- Quad-Thread CPU Processor YD130XBBM4KAE Socket AM4 Implementing Multi-Threaded Operations
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.