Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1977 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6200 - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $31.32 vs $43.86
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.23 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €48.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |